研究方向 Research Areas
本机构的研究以《周易》为核心文本资源,结合跨学科与跨文明方法,形成以下五个研究方向。 The Institute’s research centers on the I Ching as a foundational text, employing interdisciplinary and cross-civilizational approaches across five core areas.
五个核心研究方向 Five Core Research Areas
这五个方向共同构成研究院围绕《周易》展开的文本、思想、制度与文明研究框架。 Together, these five areas define the Institute’s framework for textual, intellectual, institutional, and civilizational research centered on the I Ching.
《周易》文本与思想研究 Textual and Intellectual Studies of the I Ching
研究《周易》经传文本的结构、历史形成过程及其思想体系演变,重点关注其内部逻辑结构与解释机制。
Research on the structure, historical formation, and intellectual development of the I Ching, with emphasis on its internal logic and interpretive systems.
经典体系中的《周易》地位与结构关系 The Position of the I Ching within the Classical Canon
研究《周易》在中国经典体系中的结构位置,并考察其与《诗经》《尚书》及儒家经典之间的关系与功能分布。
This area examines the structural position of the I Ching within the Chinese classical canon and its relationships with the Book of Songs (Shijing), the Book of Documents (Shangshu), and other Confucian texts.
经典思想与制度结构 Classical Thought and Institutional Structures
研究传统思想如何影响法律、治理与社会秩序的形成机制,探讨思想结构向制度结构的转化路径。
This area investigates how classical thought informs law, governance, and social order, and how intellectual structures are transformed into institutional arrangements.
文明比较与跨文化研究 Comparative and Cross-Civilizational Studies
比较不同文明中的秩序观与制度模式,分析《周易》思想在跨文明语境中的解释力。
This area explores different civilizational conceptions of order and institutional models, and the interpretive capacity of the I Ching in cross-cultural contexts.
未来文明与复杂性问题 Future Civilization and Complexity
研究在不确定性与复杂性增强的当代条件下,经典思想对未来文明结构与社会运行逻辑的解释意义。
This area studies how classical thought may contribute to understanding civilizational structure, complexity, and uncertainty in contemporary and future contexts.
总体研究逻辑 Overall Research Logic
本页面所列方向并非彼此孤立的专题,而是围绕《周易》这一核心文本,向经典体系、制度结构、文明比较与未来复杂性逐层展开的研究结构。
The five areas listed here are not isolated topics. They form a layered research structure that begins with the I Ching as a core text and extends toward the classical canon, institutional structures, civilizational comparison, and future complexity.